LoadFlow studies the history of each interconnection point. We work out what projects there were charged, which limits bind, which upgrades fixed them, and who withdrew. You get a verdict on the site and the record behind it. All numbers are derived from our intelligence layers.
Screening a site costs real money and weeks of an engineer's time. We score all 23,000 interconnection points on what has already happened at each one, so you can build a short list before paying for studies.
Every score opens into the evidence underneath it.
We match each queue project to its interconnection point, its study results, its signed agreement, and its outcome. The queue then reads as a record of what happened, not a list of requests.
1,134 campuses, matched to the plants, power contracts, and queue positions behind them. Each link is verified against the public record.
Explore the tracker →Coverage is deepest in MISO, CAISO, and SPP. Other grids are still filling in, and we label them clearly.
We track each constraint over time: when it binds, when an upgrade cures it, and when the next cluster fills it again.
Open →A diligence file on any project: costs, contacts, full history, and a clear list of what we do not have yet.
See a sample →We run power flow screening on a synthetic model of the Texas grid, testing 401,000 outage scenarios. This tool is in early preview.
Try the demo →We track the proceedings that change how projects get built, including Order 2023, colocation, and large load, with their deadlines and a daily filing feed.
Cost broken out by component, named developer contacts, the negotiated terms others got, and the full history behind each point.