29,000 projects across 12 grids, matched to the study costs, agreements, and offtake deals behind them. Pulled from the source filings, nightly.
Raw ISO queues are a mess: duplicate rows, missing coordinates, project IDs that don't match the study reports. We fix all three.
We score all 16,085 points of interconnection against the record and surface the ones worth a screening study — with the evidence, not the model behind it.
The scoring is ours; the evidence is public and cited. The map drops you straight on the shortlist.
1,134 campuses matched to the plants, PPAs, and queue positions behind their megawatts — from SEC filings and utility dockets, not announcements.
Explore the tracker →Some go deep where we've built it out. Some are still filling in — we mark which.
How a node behaves over time — whether a constraint binds, gets cured, or refills. Not just today's snapshot.
Open →A diligence file on any project: costs, contacts, dockets — and a straight list of what we don't have yet.
See a sample →Power-flow screening on a synthetic Texas grid, 401k contingencies solved. A preview of where the study tool's headed.
Try the demo →The dockets that change how projects actually get built — Order 2023, co-location, large load — with deadlines. Plus the daily filing feed.
Interconnection cost breakdowns, developer contacts, the non-standard clauses in each agreement, and the full docket history behind a project.